Тема 2. Чтение

2.03 Задания 12-18. Задания на полное понимание прочитанного текста

Вспоминай формулы по каждой теме
Решай новые задачи каждый день
Вдумчиво разбирай решения
ШКОЛКОВО.
Готовиться с нами - ЛЕГКО!
Подтемы раздела чтение
Решаем задачи

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 61#53962Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Do you believe in climate change?

 

This may seem like an odd question for a climate scientist to ask, but it is one I am constantly asked now. The typical discussion starts: "I know that the climate is changing, but hasn't it always changed through natural cycles?" Then they will often give an example, such as the medieval warm period to prove their point.

 

Those asking the question include a wide range of people I meet in the pub, friends, politicians and, increasingly, even some of those active in sustainable development and the renewable energy businesses. What I find interesting is that I have known many of these people for a long time and they never asked me this before.

 

Recent studies show that public acceptance of the scientific evidence for man-made climate change has decreased. However, the change is not that great. The difference I find in talking to people is that they feel better able to express their doubts.

 

This is very hard for scientists to understand. The scientific evidence that humanity is having an effect on the climate is overwhelming and increasing every year. Yet public perception of this is confused. People modify their beliefs about uncomfortable truth, they may have become bored of constantly hearing about climate change; or external factors such as the financial crisis may have played a role.

 

Around three years ago, I raised the issue of the way that science can be misused. In some cases scare stories in the media were over-hyping climate change, and I think we are paying the price for this now with a reaction the other way. I was concerned then that science is not always presented objectively by the media. What I don't think any of us appreciated at the time was the depth of disconnect between the scientific process and the public.

 

Which brings me to the question, should you believe in climate change? The first point to make is that it's not something you should believe or not believe in – this is a matter of science and therefore of evidence – and there's a lot of it out there. On an issue this important, I think people should look at that evidence and make their own mind up. We are often very influenced by our own personal experience. After a couple of cold winters in the UK, the common question was: "Has climate change stopped?" despite that fact that many other regions of the world were experiencing record warm temperatures. And 2010 was one of the warmest years on record. For real evidence of climate change, we have to look at the bigger picture.

 

You can see research by the Met Office that shows the evidence of man-made warming is even stronger than it was when the last report was published. A whole range of different datasets and independent analyses show the world is warming. There is a broad consensus that over the last half-century, warming has been rapid, and man-made greenhouse gas emissions are very likely to be the cause.

 

Ultimately, as the planet continues to warm, the issue of whether you believe in climate change will become more and more irrelevant. We will all experience the impacts of climate change in some way, so the evidence will be there in plain sight.

 

The more appropriate questions for today are how will our climate change and how can we prepare for those changes? That's why it's important that climate scientists continue their work, and continue sharing their evidence and research so people can stay up to date – and make up their own minds.


The author gives the example of cold winters in the UK to point out that …

1) the weather in Britain has always been unpredictable.
2) the Met Office doesn’t make public the evidence it collected.
3) there is evidence that the climate change has stopped finally.
4) people draw conclusions based on their own experience rather than scientific evidence.

Источники: ФИПИ. Открытый банк тестовых заданий

Показать ответ и решение

The author gives the example of cold winters in the UK to point out that … (Автор приводит пример холодных зим в Великобритании, чтобы подчеркнуть, что …)
Which brings me to the question, should you believe in climate change? The first point to make is that it's not something you should believe or not believe in – this is a matter of science and therefore of evidence – and there's a lot of it out there. On an issue this important, I think people should look at that evidence and make their own mind up. We are often very influenced by our own personal experience. After a couple of cold winters in the UK, the common question was: "Has climate change stopped?" despite that fact that many other regions of the world were experiencing record warm temperatures. And 2010 was one of the warmest years on record. For real evidence of climate change, we have to look at the bigger picture. (Из-за чего я задаюсь вопросом: должны ли вы верить в изменение климата? Первое, что я хочу сказать — это не то, во что можно верить или не верить – это вопрос науки и, следовательно, доказательств, и их существует множество. Я думаю, что в таком важном вопросе люди должны ознакомиться с этими доказательствами и принять собственное решение. Часто на нас очень сильно влияет наш личный опыт. После нескольких холодных зим в Великобритании часто задавался вопрос: "Прекратилось ли изменение климата?" несмотря на то, что во многих других регионах мира наблюдались рекордно высокие температуры. А 2010 год стал одним из самых теплых за всю историю наблюдений. Чтобы получить реальные доказательства изменения климата, мы должны взглянуть на картину в целом) 
Ответ: 4) people draw conclusions based on their own experience rather than scientific evidence. (Люди делают выводы, основываясь на их собственном опыте нежели на научных доказательствах) 

Ответ: 4

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 62#53963Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Do you believe in climate change?

 

This may seem like an odd question for a climate scientist to ask, but it is one I am constantly asked now. The typical discussion starts: "I know that the climate is changing, but hasn't it always changed through natural cycles?" Then they will often give an example, such as the medieval warm period to prove their point.

 

Those asking the question include a wide range of people I meet in the pub, friends, politicians and, increasingly, even some of those active in sustainable development and the renewable energy businesses. What I find interesting is that I have known many of these people for a long time and they never asked me this before.

 

Recent studies show that public acceptance of the scientific evidence for man-made climate change has decreased. However, the change is not that great. The difference I find in talking to people is that they feel better able to express their doubts.

 

This is very hard for scientists to understand. The scientific evidence that humanity is having an effect on the climate is overwhelming and increasing every year. Yet public perception of this is confused. People modify their beliefs about uncomfortable truth, they may have become bored of constantly hearing about climate change; or external factors such as the financial crisis may have played a role.

 

Around three years ago, I raised the issue of the way that science can be misused. In some cases scare stories in the media were over-hyping climate change, and I think we are paying the price for this now with a reaction the other way. I was concerned then that science is not always presented objectively by the media. What I don't think any of us appreciated at the time was the depth of disconnect between the scientific process and the public.

 

Which brings me to the question, should you believe in climate change? The first point to make is that it's not something you should believe or not believe in – this is a matter of science and therefore of evidence – and there's a lot of it out there. On an issue this important, I think people should look at that evidence and make their own mind up. We are often very influenced by our own personal experience. After a couple of cold winters in the UK, the common question was: "Has climate change stopped?" despite that fact that many other regions of the world were experiencing record warm temperatures. And 2010 was one of the warmest years on record. For real evidence of climate change, we have to look at the bigger picture.

 

You can see research by the Met Office that shows the evidence of man-made warming is even stronger than it was when the last report was published. A whole range of different datasets and independent analyses show the world is warming. There is a broad consensus that over the last half-century, warming has been rapid, and man-made greenhouse gas emissions are very likely to be the cause.

 

Ultimately, as the planet continues to warm, the issue of whether you believe in climate change will become more and more irrelevant. We will all experience the impacts of climate change in some way, so the evidence will be there in plain sight.

 

The more appropriate questions for today are how will our climate change and how can we prepare for those changes? That's why it's important that climate scientists continue their work, and continue sharing their evidence and research so people can stay up to date – and make up their own minds.


How does the author feel about the evidence of climate change?

1) It’s not enough yet.
2) It’s not very convincing.
3) It soon would become conclusive.
4) It’s irrelevant so far.

Источники: ФИПИ. Открытый банк тестовых заданий

Показать ответ и решение

How does the author feel about the evidence of climate change? (Что автор думает о доказательствах изменения климата?)
Ultimately, as the planet continues to warm, the issue of whether you believe in climate change will become more and more irrelevant. We will all experience the impacts of climate change in some way, so the evidence will be there in plain sight. (В итоге, поскольку планета продолжает нагреваться, вопрос о том, верите ли вы в изменение климата, будет становиться все более и более неактуальным. Все мы так или иначе испытаем на себе последствия изменения климата, поэтому доказательства будут у всех на виду)
Ответ: 3) It soon would become conclusive. (Вскоре они станут убедительными)

Ответ: 3

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 63#53964Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Do you believe in climate change?

 

This may seem like an odd question for a climate scientist to ask, but it is one I am constantly asked now. The typical discussion starts: "I know that the climate is changing, but hasn't it always changed through natural cycles?" Then they will often give an example, such as the medieval warm period to prove their point.

 

Those asking the question include a wide range of people I meet in the pub, friends, politicians and, increasingly, even some of those active in sustainable development and the renewable energy businesses. What I find interesting is that I have known many of these people for a long time and they never asked me this before.

 

Recent studies show that public acceptance of the scientific evidence for man-made climate change has decreased. However, the change is not that great. The difference I find in talking to people is that they feel better able to express their doubts.

 

This is very hard for scientists to understand. The scientific evidence that humanity is having an effect on the climate is overwhelming and increasing every year. Yet public perception of this is confused. People modify their beliefs about uncomfortable truth, they may have become bored of constantly hearing about climate change; or external factors such as the financial crisis may have played a role.

 

Around three years ago, I raised the issue of the way that science can be misused. In some cases scare stories in the media were over-hyping climate change, and I think we are paying the price for this now with a reaction the other way. I was concerned then that science is not always presented objectively by the media. What I don't think any of us appreciated at the time was the depth of disconnect between the scientific process and the public.

 

Which brings me to the question, should you believe in climate change? The first point to make is that it's not something you should believe or not believe in – this is a matter of science and therefore of evidence – and there's a lot of it out there. On an issue this important, I think people should look at that evidence and make their own mind up. We are often very influenced by our own personal experience. After a couple of cold winters in the UK, the common question was: "Has climate change stopped?" despite that fact that many other regions of the world were experiencing record warm temperatures. And 2010 was one of the warmest years on record. For real evidence of climate change, we have to look at the bigger picture.

 

You can see research by the Met Office that shows the evidence of man-made warming is even stronger than it was when the last report was published. A whole range of different datasets and independent analyses show the world is warming. There is a broad consensus that over the last half-century, warming has been rapid, and man-made greenhouse gas emissions are very likely to be the cause.

 

Ultimately, as the planet continues to warm, the issue of whether you believe in climate change will become more and more irrelevant. We will all experience the impacts of climate change in some way, so the evidence will be there in plain sight.

 

The more appropriate questions for today are how will our climate change and how can we prepare for those changes? That's why it's important that climate scientists continue their work, and continue sharing their evidence and research so people can stay up to date – and make up their own minds.


The author wants climate scientists to continue their work because …

1) they have not shared their findings with the public.
2) people need to know how to get ready for changes.
3) society demands more research in this field.
4) people don’t want to make up their own minds.

Источники: ФИПИ. Открытый банк тестовых заданий

Показать ответ и решение

The author wants climate scientists to continue their work because … (Автор хочет, чтобы климатические ученые продолжали свою работу из-за ... ) 
The more appropriate questions for today are how will our climate change and how can we prepare for those changes? That's why it's important that climate scientists continue their work, and continue sharing their evidence and research so people can stay up to date – and make up their own minds. (На сегодняшний день более уместны вопросы о том, как изменится наш климат и как мы можем подготовиться к этим изменениям? Вот почему важно, чтобы ученые–климатологи продолжали свою работу и продолжали делиться своими фактическими данными и исследованиями, чтобы люди могли быть в курсе последних событий и принимать собственные решения) 

Ответ: 2

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 64#57754Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Solar power creates sunny outlook for everyone

 

My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it.

 

Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment. In addition to being ecofriendly, solar energy is renewable, abundant, sustainable, not needing much effort or money, and always improving. For as long as the sun is alive, it is possible for us to get solar energy, no we should use it.

 

With major companies such as Google and Amazon using it, solar energy is earning its place in the sun. Renewable energy (solar power, wind power, etc.) has gone up in the U.S. energy mix greatly over the past 10 years. Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing.

 

But solar power doesn't have to be limited to businesses, and it shouldn't be. Using solar energy in houses and at colleges is an easy way for us to assist in saving the nature. Powering a home by the sun is not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill, and just a few extra dollars could help save the environment. Many homeowners face anxiety when it comes to their electricity bills because, in moat cases, there is nothing you can do to control your utility electricity rate. While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation.

 

Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".

 

Colleges can be benefactors for solar energy, too. If the college's newest residence hall were to go entirely solar, students would only pay roughly 52 extra cents per year, given that the residence hall is filled to capacity.

 

For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality.

 

Colleges are quite equipped to lead the solar-energy change (flat roofs, high population, eta). Our college specifically has already invested in solar-energy projects on campus. By continuing to increase the number of solar-powered buildings on campus, the conversation around solar energy could be seriously redirected.

 

With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. 


Installing solar panels in the author's home was...

1) very easy.
2) rather costly.
3) quite useless.
4) a bit hard. 

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

Installing solar panels in the author's home was... (Установка солнечных панелей в доме автора была...)
My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it. (Мои родители решили приобрести и установить солнечные панели в наш дом. Процесс был абсолютно безболезненный. Наш счет за первый месяц был на 100 долларов меньше, чем мы планировали, что, само собой разумеется, очень приятно. Я никогда не думал, что мы будем ждать прихода счета за электричество, но теперь мы этому рады)
Ответ: 1) very easy.
 

Ответ: 1

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 65#57755Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Solar power creates sunny outlook for everyone

 

My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it.

 

Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment. In addition to being ecofriendly, solar energy is renewable, abundant, sustainable, not needing much effort or money, and always improving. For as long as the sun is alive, it is possible for us to get solar energy, no we should use it.

 

With major companies such as Google and Amazon using it, solar energy is earning its place in the sun. Renewable energy (solar power, wind power, etc.) has gone up in the U.S. energy mix greatly over the past 10 years. Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing.

 

But solar power doesn't have to be limited to businesses, and it shouldn't be. Using solar energy in houses and at colleges is an easy way for us to assist in saving the nature. Powering a home by the sun is not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill, and just a few extra dollars could help save the environment. Many homeowners face anxiety when it comes to their electricity bills because, in moat cases, there is nothing you can do to control your utility electricity rate. While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation.

 

Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".

 

Colleges can be benefactors for solar energy, too. If the college's newest residence hall were to go entirely solar, students would only pay roughly 52 extra cents per year, given that the residence hall is filled to capacity.

 

For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality.

 

Colleges are quite equipped to lead the solar-energy change (flat roofs, high population, eta). Our college specifically has already invested in solar-energy projects on campus. By continuing to increase the number of solar-powered buildings on campus, the conversation around solar energy could be seriously redirected.

 

With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. 


Which benefit of solar energy is NOT mentioned in the article?

1) It's good for the nature.
2) It is rather cost-efficient.
3) It improves home design.
4) It can continue for long. 

Показать ответ и решение

Which benefit of solar energy is NOT mentioned in the article? (Какие преимущества солнечной энергии не упомянуты в статье?)
В тексте упоминаются следующие преимущества солнечной энергии:

Экологичность: "Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment""assist in saving the nature".
Экономическая эффективность: "not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill""homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".
Долговечность и возобновляемость: "renewable, abundant, sustainable... for as long as the sun is alive".

Улучшение дизайна дома (пункт 3) не упоминается в тексте. Акцент сделан на функциональных и экономических аспектах, а не на эстетике или дизайне.
Ответ: 3) It improves home design. (Это улучшает дизайн дома)

Ответ: 3

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 66#57756Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Solar power creates sunny outlook for everyone

 

My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it.

 

Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment. In addition to being ecofriendly, solar energy is renewable, abundant, sustainable, not needing much effort or money, and always improving. For as long as the sun is alive, it is possible for us to get solar energy, no we should use it.

 

With major companies such as Google and Amazon using it, solar energy is earning its place in the sun. Renewable energy (solar power, wind power, etc.) has gone up in the U.S. energy mix greatly over the past 10 years. Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing.

 

But solar power doesn't have to be limited to businesses, and it shouldn't be. Using solar energy in houses and at colleges is an easy way for us to assist in saving the nature. Powering a home by the sun is not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill, and just a few extra dollars could help save the environment. Many homeowners face anxiety when it comes to their electricity bills because, in moat cases, there is nothing you can do to control your utility electricity rate. While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation.

 

Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".

 

Colleges can be benefactors for solar energy, too. If the college's newest residence hall were to go entirely solar, students would only pay roughly 52 extra cents per year, given that the residence hall is filled to capacity.

 

For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality.

 

Colleges are quite equipped to lead the solar-energy change (flat roofs, high population, eta). Our college specifically has already invested in solar-energy projects on campus. By continuing to increase the number of solar-powered buildings on campus, the conversation around solar energy could be seriously redirected.

 

With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. 


How do big companies like Google promote renewable energy, according to the author?

1) They provide a model for other companies.
2) They select partners who use renewable energy.
3) Their customers are influenced by their views.
4) Their energy use has decreased considerably.

Показать ответ и решение

How do big companies like Google promote renewable energy, according to the author?(Как, по мнению автора, крупные компании, такие как Google, продвигают возобновляемые источники энергии?)
Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing. (Поскольку крупные компании используют преимущества солнечной энергии, многие их поставщики пошли по тому же пути. В прошлом месяце Apple сообщила, что из-за ее 100-процентной приверженности возобновляемым источникам энергии почти два десятка поставщиков аккумуляторов, клавиатур и объективов сделали то же самое)
Ответ: 
1) They provide a model for other companies. (Они служат образцом для других компаний)

Ответ: 1

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 67#57757Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Solar power creates sunny outlook for everyone

 

My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it.

 

Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment. In addition to being ecofriendly, solar energy is renewable, abundant, sustainable, not needing much effort or money, and always improving. For as long as the sun is alive, it is possible for us to get solar energy, no we should use it.

 

With major companies such as Google and Amazon using it, solar energy is earning its place in the sun. Renewable energy (solar power, wind power, etc.) has gone up in the U.S. energy mix greatly over the past 10 years. Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing.

 

But solar power doesn't have to be limited to businesses, and it shouldn't be. Using solar energy in houses and at colleges is an easy way for us to assist in saving the nature. Powering a home by the sun is not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill, and just a few extra dollars could help save the environment. Many homeowners face anxiety when it comes to their electricity bills because, in moat cases, there is nothing you can do to control your utility electricity rate. While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation.

 

Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".

 

Colleges can be benefactors for solar energy, too. If the college's newest residence hall were to go entirely solar, students would only pay roughly 52 extra cents per year, given that the residence hall is filled to capacity.

 

For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality.

 

Colleges are quite equipped to lead the solar-energy change (flat roofs, high population, eta). Our college specifically has already invested in solar-energy projects on campus. By continuing to increase the number of solar-powered buildings on campus, the conversation around solar energy could be seriously redirected.

 

With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. 


The expression "puts you in the driver's seat" in paragraph 4 ("Going solar puts you in the driver's seat...") is closest in meaning to...

1) decrease your spending.
2) make you independent in energy.
3) determine where you go.
4) follow the energy trends. 

Показать ответ и решение

The expression "puts you in the driver's seat" in paragraph 4 ("Going solar puts you in the driver's seat...") is closest in meaning to...  (Выражение "ставит вас на место водителя" в пункте 4 ("Переход на солнечную энергию ставит вас на место водителя...") наиболее близко по смыслу к...)
While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation. (В то время как стоимость солнечной энергии за последнее десятилетие снизилась более чем на 70 процентов, стоимость электроэнергии выросла примерно на пять процентов, и ожидается, что эта тенденция к росту стоимости электроэнергии сохранится. Переход на солнечную энергию дает вам возможность управлять производством энергии)
Ответ: 2) make you independent in energy. (стать независимым в плане энергии)

Ответ: 2

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 68#57758Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Solar power creates sunny outlook for everyone

 

My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it.

 

Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment. In addition to being ecofriendly, solar energy is renewable, abundant, sustainable, not needing much effort or money, and always improving. For as long as the sun is alive, it is possible for us to get solar energy, no we should use it.

 

With major companies such as Google and Amazon using it, solar energy is earning its place in the sun. Renewable energy (solar power, wind power, etc.) has gone up in the U.S. energy mix greatly over the past 10 years. Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing.

 

But solar power doesn't have to be limited to businesses, and it shouldn't be. Using solar energy in houses and at colleges is an easy way for us to assist in saving the nature. Powering a home by the sun is not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill, and just a few extra dollars could help save the environment. Many homeowners face anxiety when it comes to their electricity bills because, in moat cases, there is nothing you can do to control your utility electricity rate. While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation.

 

Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".

 

Colleges can be benefactors for solar energy, too. If the college's newest residence hall were to go entirely solar, students would only pay roughly 52 extra cents per year, given that the residence hall is filled to capacity.

 

For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality.

 

Colleges are quite equipped to lead the solar-energy change (flat roofs, high population, eta). Our college specifically has already invested in solar-energy projects on campus. By continuing to increase the number of solar-powered buildings on campus, the conversation around solar energy could be seriously redirected.

 

With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. 


Accommodation with solar panels is...

1) less popular.
2) more expensive.
3) difficult to find.
4) harder to build.

Показать ответ и решение

Accommodation with solar panels is... (Жилье с солнечными панелями — это...)
Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money". (Использование солнечной энергии в колледжах, безусловно, полезно для окружающей среды, но это также было бы выгодно и для самих домохозяйств. Средняя цена продажи жилья увеличивается, если в стоимость включены солнечные батареи. Исследование показывает, что "дома с солнечными батареями продаются на 20 процентов быстрее и на 17 процентов дороже")
Ответ: 
2) more expensive.(более дорогие)

Ответ: 2

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 69#57759Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Solar power creates sunny outlook for everyone

 

My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it.

 

Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment. In addition to being ecofriendly, solar energy is renewable, abundant, sustainable, not needing much effort or money, and always improving. For as long as the sun is alive, it is possible for us to get solar energy, no we should use it.

 

With major companies such as Google and Amazon using it, solar energy is earning its place in the sun. Renewable energy (solar power, wind power, etc.) has gone up in the U.S. energy mix greatly over the past 10 years. Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing.

 

But solar power doesn't have to be limited to businesses, and it shouldn't be. Using solar energy in houses and at colleges is an easy way for us to assist in saving the nature. Powering a home by the sun is not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill, and just a few extra dollars could help save the environment. Many homeowners face anxiety when it comes to their electricity bills because, in moat cases, there is nothing you can do to control your utility electricity rate. While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation.

 

Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".

 

Colleges can be benefactors for solar energy, too. If the college's newest residence hall were to go entirely solar, students would only pay roughly 52 extra cents per year, given that the residence hall is filled to capacity.

 

For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality.

 

Colleges are quite equipped to lead the solar-energy change (flat roofs, high population, eta). Our college specifically has already invested in solar-energy projects on campus. By continuing to increase the number of solar-powered buildings on campus, the conversation around solar energy could be seriously redirected.

 

With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. 


According to the text, if colleges use solar energy only,...

1) they will need to fill residence halls to their maximum.
2) students would pay much more for accommodation.
3) it will help to change students' views on climate change.
4) they will become more attractive for new students.

Показать ответ и решение

According to the text, if colleges use solar energy only,... (Согласно тексту, если колледжи используют только солнечную энергию...)
For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be
a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality. (Для колледжей инвестирование в проекты по экологически чистой энергетике стало бы большим стимулом для многих студентов. Молодежь, как поколение, сильно пострадавшее от изменения климата, заинтересована в том, чтобы изменить ситуацию к лучшему. Опрос показал, что почти половина молодых людей считают изменение климата и разрушение природы наиболее важными проблемами, за которыми следуют крупномасштабные конфликты или войны и неравенство.)
Ответ: 4) they will become more attractive for new students. (они станут более привлекательными для новых студентов)

Ответ: 4

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 70#57760Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Solar power creates sunny outlook for everyone

 

My parents chose to buy and install solar panels on our home. The process was absolutely painless. Our bill out after this first month was $100 less than we budgeted for, which, needless to say, is very nice. I never thought we would wait for our electric bill to come, but now we welcome it.

 

Solar power produces no harmful emissions to the environment. In addition to being ecofriendly, solar energy is renewable, abundant, sustainable, not needing much effort or money, and always improving. For as long as the sun is alive, it is possible for us to get solar energy, no we should use it.

 

With major companies such as Google and Amazon using it, solar energy is earning its place in the sun. Renewable energy (solar power, wind power, etc.) has gone up in the U.S. energy mix greatly over the past 10 years. Because big businesses are taking advantage of solar energy, many of their suppliers have gone down the same path. Apple reported last month that because of its 100 percent commitment to renewable energy, nearly two dozen suppliers of batteries, keyboards, and lenses have made the same thing.

 

But solar power doesn't have to be limited to businesses, and it shouldn't be. Using solar energy in houses and at colleges is an easy way for us to assist in saving the nature. Powering a home by the sun is not much more expensive than paying a regular electric bill, and just a few extra dollars could help save the environment. Many homeowners face anxiety when it comes to their electricity bills because, in moat cases, there is nothing you can do to control your utility electricity rate. While the cost of solar has decreased by more than 70 percent in the past decade, the cost of electricity has risen by about five percent, and that trend in rising electric cost is expected to continue. Going solar puts you in the driver's seat when it comes to energy generation.

 

Using solar power at colleges is certainly beneficial to the environment, but it would also be advantageous to the households themselves. The average home sale price increases if solar panels are included. A study concludes that "homes with solar panels sell 20 percent faster and for 17 percent more money".

 

Colleges can be benefactors for solar energy, too. If the college's newest residence hall were to go entirely solar, students would only pay roughly 52 extra cents per year, given that the residence hall is filled to capacity.

 

For colleges, investing in clean-energy projects would be a large pull for many students. As a generation highly affected by climate change, young people are interested in making a difference. A survey found that almost half of young people think climate change and the destruction of nature is the most critical issue, followed by large scale conflicts or wars and inequality.

 

Colleges are quite equipped to lead the solar-energy change (flat roofs, high population, eta). Our college specifically has already invested in solar-energy projects on campus. By continuing to increase the number of solar-powered buildings on campus, the conversation around solar energy could be seriously redirected.

 

With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. 


The author thinks that the future of solar energy...

1) depends on authorities.
2) is unstable in general.
3) determines our fate.
4) is rather optimistic. 

Показать ответ и решение

 

The author thinks that the future of solar energy... (Автор считает, что будущее солнечной энергии...)
With its benefits rapidly multiplying for all parties involved in its use, it is solar energy's time to shine. (Поскольку её преимущества быстро умножаются для всех вовлеченных сторон, настало время солнечной энергии сиять)
Ответ: 4) is rather optimistic. (довольно оптимистично)

Ответ: 4

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 71#82900Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

What it's really like to be a bike commuter

 

No discussion of transportation in New York would be complete without talking about one of the cheapest, easiest and, increasingly, most popular ways of getting around the city — biking.

 

About 450,000 bike trips are taken every day in the five boroughs, with one in five of those trips being taken by someone who's commuting. There are now more than 1,000 bike lanes in the city, a number that has doubled lately compared to what we had a decade ago.

 

I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. Once I started riding, I preferred it to the train. It was faster and more fun. The best part of biking for me is the joy of experiencing the natural beauty of this island every day, and the feeling of being in control of your own destiny. I know roughly how long it will take me to get from Point A to Point B without issue. It is better than caffeine in the morning and I look forward to the ride home every day no matter how tired I am. I am energized by the experience and it keeps me in shape. It saves me money. It gets my blood and endorphins flowing.

 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer.

 

Pedestrians, without a question, are the biggest challenge you face while riding. Drivers are predictable; they follow the rules of traffic and they don't want to hit you any more than you want to hit them. Pedestrians are chaotic. They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time — that is precisely what sent me to hospital with a mild concussion a few years back (I was okay, I managed to get back on my bike and ride).

 

Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling (and walking) safer in New York. Pedestrians, especially tourists, need to know about the existence of bike lanes, and that if they walk into a bike lane, they will get ticketed, hurt, or killed. They should have instructional videos at every major airport. I'm inclined to say folks from non-major U.S. cities are less likely to be familiar with bike lanes than tourists from around the world.

 

I think most people don't respect cyclists and their safety. I don't think most pedestrians and motorists understand what cyclists go through on a daily basis. Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect. Looking before you open your door, before you cross the street, before you make a U-turn, using your turn signal, etc., would make the cycling experience much safer for everyone — including motorists and pedestrians.

 

The city should be friendlier to cyclists because we reduce car and train traffic exponentially. Those LED signs that tell you that there will be traffic delays? Maybe they can say to check for cyclists before exiting the car.


According to the article, biking in NYC is...

1. as expensive as other types of transport.
2. mostly done by those who get to work daily.
3. preferred by more and more people.
4. especially popular in certain districts.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

According to the article, biking in NYC is... (Согласно статье, велосипедное движение в Нью-Йорке...)
 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. (Велосипедное движение становится популярнее среди ньюйоркцев; 40% поддержали расширение защищенных велодорожек в городе)
Ответ: 3. preferred by more and more people.(предпочитается все большим количеством людей)

Ответ: 3

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 72#82899Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

What it's really like to be a bike commuter

 

No discussion of transportation in New York would be complete without talking about one of the cheapest, easiest and, increasingly, most popular ways of getting around the city — biking.

 

About 450,000 bike trips are taken every day in the five boroughs, with one in five of those trips being taken by someone who's commuting. There are now more than 1,000 bike lanes in the city, a number that has doubled lately compared to what we had a decade ago.

 

I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. Once I started riding, I preferred it to the train. It was faster and more fun. The best part of biking for me is the joy of experiencing the natural beauty of this island every day, and the feeling of being in control of your own destiny. I know roughly how long it will take me to get from Point A to Point B without issue. It is better than caffeine in the morning and I look forward to the ride home every day no matter how tired I am. I am energized by the experience and it keeps me in shape. It saves me money. It gets my blood and endorphins flowing.

 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer.

 

Pedestrians, without a question, are the biggest challenge you face while riding. Drivers are predictable; they follow the rules of traffic and they don't want to hit you any more than you want to hit them. Pedestrians are chaotic. They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time — that is precisely what sent me to hospital with a mild concussion a few years back (I was okay, I managed to get back on my bike and ride).

 

Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling (and walking) safer in New York. Pedestrians, especially tourists, need to know about the existence of bike lanes, and that if they walk into a bike lane, they will get ticketed, hurt, or killed. They should have instructional videos at every major airport. I'm inclined to say folks from non-major U.S. cities are less likely to be familiar with bike lanes than tourists from around the world.

 

I think most people don't respect cyclists and their safety. I don't think most pedestrians and motorists understand what cyclists go through on a daily basis. Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect. Looking before you open your door, before you cross the street, before you make a U-turn, using your turn signal, etc., would make the cycling experience much safer for everyone — including motorists and pedestrians.

 

The city should be friendlier to cyclists because we reduce car and train traffic exponentially. Those LED signs that tell you that there will be traffic delays? Maybe they can say to check for cyclists before exiting the car.


The author started riding a bike because...

1. she wanted to keep fit.
2. the train service was rare.
3. she was short of money.
4. her blood pressure was low.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

The author started riding a bike because... (Автор начала кататься на велосипеде потому что...)
I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. (Я была фрилансером и буквально не могла позволить себе поезд в те дни, когда нужно было ехать в офис, поэтому с финансовой точки зрения имело смысл приобрести недорогой велосипед)
Ответ: 3. she was short of money. (Ей не хватало денег) 

Ответ: 3

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 73#82898Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

What it's really like to be a bike commuter

 

No discussion of transportation in New York would be complete without talking about one of the cheapest, easiest and, increasingly, most popular ways of getting around the city — biking.

 

About 450,000 bike trips are taken every day in the five boroughs, with one in five of those trips being taken by someone who's commuting. There are now more than 1,000 bike lanes in the city, a number that has doubled lately compared to what we had a decade ago.

 

I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. Once I started riding, I preferred it to the train. It was faster and more fun. The best part of biking for me is the joy of experiencing the natural beauty of this island every day, and the feeling of being in control of your own destiny. I know roughly how long it will take me to get from Point A to Point B without issue. It is better than caffeine in the morning and I look forward to the ride home every day no matter how tired I am. I am energized by the experience and it keeps me in shape. It saves me money. It gets my blood and endorphins flowing.

 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer.

 

Pedestrians, without a question, are the biggest challenge you face while riding. Drivers are predictable; they follow the rules of traffic and they don't want to hit you any more than you want to hit them. Pedestrians are chaotic. They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time — that is precisely what sent me to hospital with a mild concussion a few years back (I was okay, I managed to get back on my bike and ride).

 

Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling (and walking) safer in New York. Pedestrians, especially tourists, need to know about the existence of bike lanes, and that if they walk into a bike lane, they will get ticketed, hurt, or killed. They should have instructional videos at every major airport. I'm inclined to say folks from non-major U.S. cities are less likely to be familiar with bike lanes than tourists from around the world.

 

I think most people don't respect cyclists and their safety. I don't think most pedestrians and motorists understand what cyclists go through on a daily basis. Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect. Looking before you open your door, before you cross the street, before you make a U-turn, using your turn signal, etc., would make the cycling experience much safer for everyone — including motorists and pedestrians.

 

The city should be friendlier to cyclists because we reduce car and train traffic exponentially. Those LED signs that tell you that there will be traffic delays? Maybe they can say to check for cyclists before exiting the car.


Rosy in "everything is completely rosy for bike commuters" (paragraph 4) is closest  in meaning to...

1. optimistic.
2. clear.
3. doubtful.
4. available.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

Rosy in "everything is completely rosy for bike commuters" (paragraph 4) is closest  in meaning to... "Розовый" в фразе "для велосипедистов все абсолютно розовое" (пункт 4) означает...
Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer. (Езда на велосипеде становится все более популярной среди жителей Нью-Йорка; 40% поддержали расширение защищенных велосипедных дорожек в городе. Это не означает, что для тех, кто ездит на велосипеде в Нью-Йорке, все обстоит благополучно. Хотя ситуация становится лучше, город мог бы сделать еще многое, чтобы сделать свои улицы более безопасными)
Ответ: 
1. optimistic. (Оптимистично)

Ответ: 1

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 74#82897Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

What it's really like to be a bike commuter

 

No discussion of transportation in New York would be complete without talking about one of the cheapest, easiest and, increasingly, most popular ways of getting around the city — biking.

 

About 450,000 bike trips are taken every day in the five boroughs, with one in five of those trips being taken by someone who's commuting. There are now more than 1,000 bike lanes in the city, a number that has doubled lately compared to what we had a decade ago.

 

I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. Once I started riding, I preferred it to the train. It was faster and more fun. The best part of biking for me is the joy of experiencing the natural beauty of this island every day, and the feeling of being in control of your own destiny. I know roughly how long it will take me to get from Point A to Point B without issue. It is better than caffeine in the morning and I look forward to the ride home every day no matter how tired I am. I am energized by the experience and it keeps me in shape. It saves me money. It gets my blood and endorphins flowing.

 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer.

 

Pedestrians, without a question, are the biggest challenge you face while riding. Drivers are predictable; they follow the rules of traffic and they don't want to hit you any more than you want to hit them. Pedestrians are chaotic. They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time — that is precisely what sent me to hospital with a mild concussion a few years back (I was okay, I managed to get back on my bike and ride).

 

Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling (and walking) safer in New York. Pedestrians, especially tourists, need to know about the existence of bike lanes, and that if they walk into a bike lane, they will get ticketed, hurt, or killed. They should have instructional videos at every major airport. I'm inclined to say folks from non-major U.S. cities are less likely to be familiar with bike lanes than tourists from around the world.

 

I think most people don't respect cyclists and their safety. I don't think most pedestrians and motorists understand what cyclists go through on a daily basis. Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect. Looking before you open your door, before you cross the street, before you make a U-turn, using your turn signal, etc., would make the cycling experience much safer for everyone — including motorists and pedestrians.

 

The city should be friendlier to cyclists because we reduce car and train traffic exponentially. Those LED signs that tell you that there will be traffic delays? Maybe they can say to check for cyclists before exiting the car.


The author thinks pedestrians...

1. are very difficult to predict.
2. are less dangerous than drivers.
3. pay attention to traffic.
4. try to avoid bicycle routes.

 

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

The author thinks pedestrians... (Автор думает, что пешеходы...)
Pedestrians are chaotic.
They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time.(Пешеходы ведут себя хаотично. Они переходят дорогу, когда им не следует этого делать. Они будут идти по велосипедным дорожкам, повернувшись спиной к велосипедистам. Они выйдут на велосипедную дорожку в трех футах от вас в середине квартала, так что у вас не будет времени на реакцию.)
Ответ: 1. are very difficult to predict. (непредсказуемы)

Ответ: 1

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 75#82896Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

What it's really like to be a bike commuter

 

No discussion of transportation in New York would be complete without talking about one of the cheapest, easiest and, increasingly, most popular ways of getting around the city — biking.

 

About 450,000 bike trips are taken every day in the five boroughs, with one in five of those trips being taken by someone who's commuting. There are now more than 1,000 bike lanes in the city, a number that has doubled lately compared to what we had a decade ago.

 

I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. Once I started riding, I preferred it to the train. It was faster and more fun. The best part of biking for me is the joy of experiencing the natural beauty of this island every day, and the feeling of being in control of your own destiny. I know roughly how long it will take me to get from Point A to Point B without issue. It is better than caffeine in the morning and I look forward to the ride home every day no matter how tired I am. I am energized by the experience and it keeps me in shape. It saves me money. It gets my blood and endorphins flowing.

 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer.

 

Pedestrians, without a question, are the biggest challenge you face while riding. Drivers are predictable; they follow the rules of traffic and they don't want to hit you any more than you want to hit them. Pedestrians are chaotic. They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time — that is precisely what sent me to hospital with a mild concussion a few years back (I was okay, I managed to get back on my bike and ride).

 

Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling (and walking) safer in New York. Pedestrians, especially tourists, need to know about the existence of bike lanes, and that if they walk into a bike lane, they will get ticketed, hurt, or killed. They should have instructional videos at every major airport. I'm inclined to say folks from non-major U.S. cities are less likely to be familiar with bike lanes than tourists from around the world.

 

I think most people don't respect cyclists and their safety. I don't think most pedestrians and motorists understand what cyclists go through on a daily basis. Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect. Looking before you open your door, before you cross the street, before you make a U-turn, using your turn signal, etc., would make the cycling experience much safer for everyone — including motorists and pedestrians.

 

The city should be friendlier to cyclists because we reduce car and train traffic exponentially. Those LED signs that tell you that there will be traffic delays? Maybe they can say to check for cyclists before exiting the car.


What solution does the author offer to make cycling safer?

1. Installing video cameras.
2. Increasing awareness.
3. Improving bike lanes.
4. Introducing traffic fines.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

What solution does the author offer to make cycling safer? (Какое решение предлагает автор, чтобы сделать езду на велосипеде безопасней?)
Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling safer.
Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect.(Необходимо обучать пешеходов и штрафовать их. Каждый должен провести хотя бы один полный день в городе в качестве велосипедиста, пешехода и водителя, чтобы выработать взаимное уважение.)
Ответ: 2. Increasing awareness. (Повышение осведомленности)

Ответ: 2

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 76#82895Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

What it's really like to be a bike commuter

 

No discussion of transportation in New York would be complete without talking about one of the cheapest, easiest and, increasingly, most popular ways of getting around the city — biking.

 

About 450,000 bike trips are taken every day in the five boroughs, with one in five of those trips being taken by someone who's commuting. There are now more than 1,000 bike lanes in the city, a number that has doubled lately compared to what we had a decade ago.

 

I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. Once I started riding, I preferred it to the train. It was faster and more fun. The best part of biking for me is the joy of experiencing the natural beauty of this island every day, and the feeling of being in control of your own destiny. I know roughly how long it will take me to get from Point A to Point B without issue. It is better than caffeine in the morning and I look forward to the ride home every day no matter how tired I am. I am energized by the experience and it keeps me in shape. It saves me money. It gets my blood and endorphins flowing.

 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer.

 

Pedestrians, without a question, are the biggest challenge you face while riding. Drivers are predictable; they follow the rules of traffic and they don't want to hit you any more than you want to hit them. Pedestrians are chaotic. They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time — that is precisely what sent me to hospital with a mild concussion a few years back (I was okay, I managed to get back on my bike and ride).

 

Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling (and walking) safer in New York. Pedestrians, especially tourists, need to know about the existence of bike lanes, and that if they walk into a bike lane, they will get ticketed, hurt, or killed. They should have instructional videos at every major airport. I'm inclined to say folks from non-major U.S. cities are less likely to be familiar with bike lanes than tourists from around the world.

 

I think most people don't respect cyclists and their safety. I don't think most pedestrians and motorists understand what cyclists go through on a daily basis. Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect. Looking before you open your door, before you cross the street, before you make a U-turn, using your turn signal, etc., would make the cycling experience much safer for everyone — including motorists and pedestrians.

 

The city should be friendlier to cyclists because we reduce car and train traffic exponentially. Those LED signs that tell you that there will be traffic delays? Maybe they can say to check for cyclists before exiting the car.


The author suggests that everyone should cycle at least one entire day to...

1. learn the traffic rules.
2. decrease the traffic.
3. enjoy the experience.
4. understand those who ride.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

The author suggests that everyone should cycle at least one entire day to... (Автор предполагает, что каждый должен ездить на велосипеде по крайней мере целый день, чтобы...)

Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect.(Каждый должен провести хотя бы один полный день в городе в качестве велосипедиста, пешехода и водителя, чтобы выработать взаимное уважение)
Ответ:  4. understand those who ride. (Понять тех, кто ездит) 

Ответ: 4

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 77#82894Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

What it's really like to be a bike commuter

 

No discussion of transportation in New York would be complete without talking about one of the cheapest, easiest and, increasingly, most popular ways of getting around the city — biking.

 

About 450,000 bike trips are taken every day in the five boroughs, with one in five of those trips being taken by someone who's commuting. There are now more than 1,000 bike lanes in the city, a number that has doubled lately compared to what we had a decade ago.

 

I was a freelancer and I literally couldn't afford to take the train some days I had to come into the office, so it made financial sense to invest in a cheap bike. Once I started riding, I preferred it to the train. It was faster and more fun. The best part of biking for me is the joy of experiencing the natural beauty of this island every day, and the feeling of being in control of your own destiny. I know roughly how long it will take me to get from Point A to Point B without issue. It is better than caffeine in the morning and I look forward to the ride home every day no matter how tired I am. I am energized by the experience and it keeps me in shape. It saves me money. It gets my blood and endorphins flowing.

 

Biking is becoming more popular among New Yorkers; 40 % supported the expansion of protected bike paths in the city. This doesn't mean that everything is completely rosy for bike commuters in New York City. While things are getting better, there's more the city could do to make its streets safer.

 

Pedestrians, without a question, are the biggest challenge you face while riding. Drivers are predictable; they follow the rules of traffic and they don't want to hit you any more than you want to hit them. Pedestrians are chaotic. They cross when they shouldn't. They'll walk in bike lanes with their backs facing bike traffic. They'll step into a bike lane three feet in front of you in the middle of the block so you'll have no reaction time — that is precisely what sent me to hospital with a mild concussion a few years back (I was okay, I managed to get back on my bike and ride).

 

Pedestrian education and citations is what we need to make cycling (and walking) safer in New York. Pedestrians, especially tourists, need to know about the existence of bike lanes, and that if they walk into a bike lane, they will get ticketed, hurt, or killed. They should have instructional videos at every major airport. I'm inclined to say folks from non-major U.S. cities are less likely to be familiar with bike lanes than tourists from around the world.

 

I think most people don't respect cyclists and their safety. I don't think most pedestrians and motorists understand what cyclists go through on a daily basis. Everyone should be required to cycle, walk, and drive at least one entire day in this city in order to build some mutual respect. Looking before you open your door, before you cross the street, before you make a U-turn, using your turn signal, etc., would make the cycling experience much safer for everyone — including motorists and pedestrians.

 

The city should be friendlier to cyclists because we reduce car and train traffic exponentially. Those LED signs that tell you that there will be traffic delays? Maybe they can say to check for cyclists before exiting the car.


What is the main idea of the article?

1. Cycling in a big city is a dangerous experience.
2. Following the traffic rules can save your life.
3. People should be more respectful of cyclists.
4. Cycling is a means of transport for the future.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

What is the main idea of the article? (В чем основная идея статьи?)

Автор подчеркивает необходимость взаимного уважения между всеми участниками дорожного движения и предлагает обучение и совместный опыт в качестве решений. Текст фокусируется на изменении отношения, а не только на инфраструктуре или правилах. 

Ответ: 3. People should be more respectful of cyclists. (Людям стоит больше уважать велосепедистов)

Ответ: 3

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 78#57150Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Going solar

 

Is solar a smart long-term investment that can reduce your carbon footprint? Absolutely — and everybody from the Department of Energy to Leonardo DiCaprio can back it up. But even something as trendy as solar can have downsides. Let's break down the top perks and quirks of going solar.

 

The top benefit of solar panels is pretty clear. When you install solar power for your home, you generate your own electricity, become less reliant on your electric utility and reduce your monthly electric bill. A solar panel system typically has a 25-30-year lifespan, which means that you can out your electricity costs for decades to come by going solar. Also the cost of solar is dropping across the nation. The next point is that it improves the value of your home. The recent studies found that property values increase after solar is installed. Moreover, it can pay you money while you are earning back your investment. Due to a number of awesome solar incentives in the U.S., solar panels can actually turn you a profit in addition to generating bill savings that pay off the cost of the system.

 

Then, you have to consider the volatile nature of electricity prices and determine what utility rates will be in years to come. When you compare the coat of utility electricity with home solar, you should keep in mind that you can expect electricity rates to increase annually. Over the past years, national electricity costs have increased at a rate of 2.2 % per year. So this is an added incentive for solar: when you generate your own energy with a rooftop system, you're taking control of energy costs so that you are no longer a victim to variable utility rates. 

 

It reduces carbon emissions and helps move towards energy independence. As the world searches for the most cost-effective ways to reduce our carbon output in the face of global climate change, solar energy has become a trendy resource for a good reason and perhaps a small victory giving us the right to celebrate Earth Day.

 

But you should keep in mind that it doesn't work for every type of roof. Certain roofing materials used in older or historical homes can be difficult for solar installers to work with. In addition, many homes and apartment buildings have skylights or other rooftop additions like roof decks that can make the solar installation process difficult or costly. In the long run, however, this shouldn't be a barrier. If your home does not qualify for a rooftop solar system, you still have options: ground mounted solar panels or buying a share in a community solar garden can get you around this drawback of solar energy. Well, not many drawbacks, yeah?

 

After reviewing our pros and cons of solar energy, there are some clear takeaways. Rooftop solar panels aren't the perfect fit for everyone, but that's okay. Like any other home efficiency product, solar panels provide clear benefits to property owners that are in need of energy upgrades and electricity bill reduction. Not everyone fits that description. Solar energy should be thought of as an investment: a low-risk investment with major returns, but a hefty investment nonetheless.

 

We are moving towards clean energy, and solar is our cheapest option. There is nothing unclear about our energy future if we want to get rid of fossil fuels and move to renewables. Solar is the most scalable, consumer-friendly solution. 


Who supports solar energy?

1) Only famous film stars.
2) Only government authorities.
3) Various people and institutions.
4) People who follow trends.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

Who supports solar energy? (Кто поддерживает солнечную энергию?)

Is solar a smart long-term investment that can reduce your carbon footprint? Absolutely — and everybody from the Department of Energy to Leonardo DiCaprio can back it up. (Является ли солнечная энергетика разумной долгосрочной инвестицией, которая может снизить ваш углеродный след?Абсолютно — и все от Министерства энергетики до Леонардо ДиКаприо могут это подтвердить)
Ответ: 3) Various people and institutions. (Разные люди и учреждения)

Ответ: 3

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 79#57151Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Going solar

 

Is solar a smart long-term investment that can reduce your carbon footprint? Absolutely — and everybody from the Department of Energy to Leonardo DiCaprio can back it up. But even something as trendy as solar can have downsides. Let's break down the top perks and quirks of going solar.

 

The top benefit of solar panels is pretty clear. When you install solar power for your home, you generate your own electricity, become less reliant on your electric utility and reduce your monthly electric bill. A solar panel system typically has a 25-30-year lifespan, which means that you can out your electricity costs for decades to come by going solar. Also the cost of solar is dropping across the nation. The next point is that it improves the value of your home. The recent studies found that property values increase after solar is installed. Moreover, it can pay you money while you are earning back your investment. Due to a number of awesome solar incentives in the U.S., solar panels can actually turn you a profit in addition to generating bill savings that pay off the cost of the system.

 

Then, you have to consider the volatile nature of electricity prices and determine what utility rates will be in years to come. When you compare the coat of utility electricity with home solar, you should keep in mind that you can expect electricity rates to increase annually. Over the past years, national electricity costs have increased at a rate of 2.2 % per year. So this is an added incentive for solar: when you generate your own energy with a rooftop system, you're taking control of energy costs so that you are no longer a victim to variable utility rates. 

 

It reduces carbon emissions and helps move towards energy independence. As the world searches for the most cost-effective ways to reduce our carbon output in the face of global climate change, solar energy has become a trendy resource for a good reason and perhaps a small victory giving us the right to celebrate Earth Day.

 

But you should keep in mind that it doesn't work for every type of roof. Certain roofing materials used in older or historical homes can be difficult for solar installers to work with. In addition, many homes and apartment buildings have skylights or other rooftop additions like roof decks that can make the solar installation process difficult or costly. In the long run, however, this shouldn't be a barrier. If your home does not qualify for a rooftop solar system, you still have options: ground mounted solar panels or buying a share in a community solar garden can get you around this drawback of solar energy. Well, not many drawbacks, yeah?

 

After reviewing our pros and cons of solar energy, there are some clear takeaways. Rooftop solar panels aren't the perfect fit for everyone, but that's okay. Like any other home efficiency product, solar panels provide clear benefits to property owners that are in need of energy upgrades and electricity bill reduction. Not everyone fits that description. Solar energy should be thought of as an investment: a low-risk investment with major returns, but a hefty investment nonetheless.

 

We are moving towards clean energy, and solar is our cheapest option. There is nothing unclear about our energy future if we want to get rid of fossil fuels and move to renewables. Solar is the most scalable, consumer-friendly solution. 


Which is the top advantage of solar power?

1) Better electric utilities.
2) Saving money monthly.
3) A long service period of equipment.
4) Decreasing expenses for installation.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

Which is the top advantage of solar power? (Какое главное преимущество солнечной энергии?)
The top benefit of solar panels is pretty clear. When you install solar power for your home, you generate your own electricity, become less reliant on your electric utility and reduce your monthly electric bill. (Главное преимущество солнечных панелей очевидно. Когда вы устанавливаете солнечные панели для дома, вы производите собственную электроэнергию, становитесь менее зависимыми от коммунальных служб и сокращаете ежемесячные счета за электричество
Ответ: 2) Saving money monthly. (Ежемесячная экономия денег)

Ответ: 2

Ошибка.
Попробуйте повторить позже

Задача 80#57152Максимум баллов за задание: 1

Прочитайте текст и выполните задания 12-18. В каждом задании запишите в поле ответа цифру 1, 2, 3 или 4, соответствующую выбранному вами варианту ответа.

 

Going solar

 

Is solar a smart long-term investment that can reduce your carbon footprint? Absolutely — and everybody from the Department of Energy to Leonardo DiCaprio can back it up. But even something as trendy as solar can have downsides. Let's break down the top perks and quirks of going solar.

 

The top benefit of solar panels is pretty clear. When you install solar power for your home, you generate your own electricity, become less reliant on your electric utility and reduce your monthly electric bill. A solar panel system typically has a 25-30-year lifespan, which means that you can out your electricity costs for decades to come by going solar. Also the cost of solar is dropping across the nation. The next point is that it improves the value of your home. The recent studies found that property values increase after solar is installed. Moreover, it can pay you money while you are earning back your investment. Due to a number of awesome solar incentives in the U.S., solar panels can actually turn you a profit in addition to generating bill savings that pay off the cost of the system.

 

Then, you have to consider the volatile nature of electricity prices and determine what utility rates will be in years to come. When you compare the coat of utility electricity with home solar, you should keep in mind that you can expect electricity rates to increase annually. Over the past years, national electricity costs have increased at a rate of 2.2 % per year. So this is an added incentive for solar: when you generate your own energy with a rooftop system, you're taking control of energy costs so that you are no longer a victim to variable utility rates. 

 

It reduces carbon emissions and helps move towards energy independence. As the world searches for the most cost-effective ways to reduce our carbon output in the face of global climate change, solar energy has become a trendy resource for a good reason and perhaps a small victory giving us the right to celebrate Earth Day.

 

But you should keep in mind that it doesn't work for every type of roof. Certain roofing materials used in older or historical homes can be difficult for solar installers to work with. In addition, many homes and apartment buildings have skylights or other rooftop additions like roof decks that can make the solar installation process difficult or costly. In the long run, however, this shouldn't be a barrier. If your home does not qualify for a rooftop solar system, you still have options: ground mounted solar panels or buying a share in a community solar garden can get you around this drawback of solar energy. Well, not many drawbacks, yeah?

 

After reviewing our pros and cons of solar energy, there are some clear takeaways. Rooftop solar panels aren't the perfect fit for everyone, but that's okay. Like any other home efficiency product, solar panels provide clear benefits to property owners that are in need of energy upgrades and electricity bill reduction. Not everyone fits that description. Solar energy should be thought of as an investment: a low-risk investment with major returns, but a hefty investment nonetheless.

 

We are moving towards clean energy, and solar is our cheapest option. There is nothing unclear about our energy future if we want to get rid of fossil fuels and move to renewables. Solar is the most scalable, consumer-friendly solution. 


It is implied that solar energy is becoming more...

1) profitable over years.
2) expensive in the future.
3) controlled by government.
4) utilized by institutions.

Источники: Сборник заданий для подготовки к ЕГЭ по английскому языку под ред. М.В. Вербицкой 2024 год

Показать ответ и решение

It is implied that solar energy is becoming more... (Подразумевается, что солнечная энергия становится все более...)

When you compare the cost of utility electricity with home solar, you should keep in mind that you can expect electricity rates to increase annually. Over the past years, national electricity costs have increased at a rate of 2.2 % per year. So this is an added incentive for solar: when you generate your own energy with a rooftop system, you're taking control of energy costs so that you are no longer a victim to variable utility rates.
(При сравнении стоимости коммунальной электроэнергии с домашней солнечной энергией следует учитывать, что тарифы на электроэнергию будут расти ежегодно. Национальные затраты на электроэнергию увеличивались на 2,2% в год. Это дополнительный стимул для солнечной энергетики: вырабатывая собственную энергию с помощью rooftop-системы, вы контролируете энергозатраты и перестаете быть жертвой переменных тарифов.)

Ответ: 1) profitable over years. (выгодной с течением времени)

Ответ: 1
Рулетка
Вы можете получить скидку в рулетке!